









































RealmoftheDragon wrote:why would they bother to give him the death penalty after healing him in the hosptial?














RealmoftheDragon wrote:If they're taking their time to heal and recover this young man in the hospital now, why would they bother to give him the death penalty after healing him in the hosptial? It just seems like a waste of time to me, if you're going to shoot him, fix the wounds, and then kil him afterwards anyways, why did you even bother to heal his wounds in the first place and just not let him die where he was? You're only wasting the doctors time when they could've been working on someody else.
I personally think that an imprison for life sentence would be more sufficent for his crimes. After all, no matter what the cause, I'm always voting against the death penalty anyways.















DGFone wrote:RealmoftheDragon wrote:If they're taking their time to heal and recover this young man in the hospital now, why would they bother to give him the death penalty after healing him in the hosptial? It just seems like a waste of time to me, if you're going to shoot him, fix the wounds, and then kil him afterwards anyways, why did you even bother to heal his wounds in the first place and just not let him die where he was? You're only wasting the doctors time when they could've been working on someody else.
I personally think that an imprison for life sentence would be more sufficent for his crimes. After all, no matter what the cause, I'm always voting against the death penalty anyways.
They need him alive in order to talk and explain exactly what happened and who was involved. I've already read that a terrorist ring is already suspected to be responsible.













RealmoftheDragon wrote: My point IS that even if they want to get answers from him, still, I don't see the use in healing him, getting answers, and then killing him anyways.
One of the strong urges, I know, are my thoughts against the death penalty as a whole. And evn though he was one of the ones who bombed and killed all of those innocents, it just disrespectful to heal somebody who YOU almost killed just to get answers and them kill him right afterwards.















FlipMode wrote:RealmoftheDragon wrote: My point IS that even if they want to get answers from him, still, I don't see the use in healing him, getting answers, and then killing him anyways.
One of the strong urges, I know, are my thoughts against the death penalty as a whole. And even though he was one of the ones who bombed and killed all of those innocents, it just disrespectful to heal somebody who YOU almost killed just to get answers and them kill him right afterwards.
It's pretty darn disrespectful to be a terrorist too, though.











































Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 499 guests