Boston Marathon Bombing

[DGFone]

[quote="RealmoftheDragon"]If they're taking their time to heal and recover this young man in the hospital now, why would they bother to give him the death penalty after healing him in the hosptial? It just seems like a waste of time to me, if you're going to shoot him, fix the wounds, and then kil him afterwards anyways, why did you even bother to heal his wounds in the first place and just not let him die where he was? You're only wasting the doctors time when they could've been working on someody else.
I personally think that an imprison for life sentence would be more sufficent for his crimes. After all, no matter what the cause, I'm always voting against the death penalty anyways.[/quote]

They need him alive in order to talk and explain exactly what happened and who was involved. I've already read that a terrorist ring is already suspected to be responsible.

[DreamEater]

[quote="DGFone"][quote="RealmoftheDragon"]If they're taking their time to heal and recover this young man in the hospital now, why would they bother to give him the death penalty after healing him in the hosptial? It just seems like a waste of time to me, if you're going to shoot him, fix the wounds, and then kil him afterwards anyways, why did you even bother to heal his wounds in the first place and just not let him die where he was? You're only wasting the doctors time when they could've been working on someody else.
I personally think that an imprison for life sentence would be more sufficent for his crimes. After all, no matter what the cause, I'm always voting against the death penalty anyways.[/quote]

They need him alive in order to talk and explain exactly what happened and who was involved. I've already read that a terrorist ring is already suspected to be responsible.[/quote]

Well, I know that already. But they shot him in the throat and he currently can't talk anyways. My point IS that even if they want to get answers from him, still, I don't see the use in healing him, getting answers, and then killing him anyways.

One of the strong urges, I know, are my thoughts against the death penalty as a whole. And evn though he was one of the ones who bombed and killed all of those innocents, it just disrespectful to heal somebody who YOU almost killed just to get answers and them kill him right afterwards.

[FlipMode]

[quote="RealmoftheDragon"] My point IS that even if they want to get answers from him, still, I don't see the use in healing him, getting answers, and then killing him anyways.

One of the strong urges, I know, are my thoughts against the death penalty as a whole. And evn though he was one of the ones who bombed and killed all of those innocents, it just disrespectful to heal somebody who YOU almost killed just to get answers and them kill him right afterwards.[/quote]

It's pretty darn disrespectful to be a terrorist too, though.

[DreamEater]

[quote="FlipMode"][quote="RealmoftheDragon"] My point IS that even if they want to get answers from him, still, I don't see the use in healing him, getting answers, and then killing him anyways.

One of the strong urges, I know, are my thoughts against the death penalty as a whole. And even though he was one of the ones who bombed and killed all of those innocents, it just disrespectful to heal somebody who YOU almost killed just to get answers and them kill him right afterwards.[/quote]

It's pretty darn disrespectful to be a terrorist too, though.[/quote]

I stated that in my post already.

[FlipMode]

Yeah but it doesn't make sense... We should not give the death penalty to terrorists? I don't think "it's disrespectful" is a particularly strong argument in this scenario.
We don't have the death penalty here but if we did, if anything merited it then it would be mass murder.

[Azdgari]

Our nation will not do -anything- to him, especially not kill him, until he has been tried in a court of law. That is why he is recovering in the hospital, so that he can stand trial to his crimes. I do agree with you however: I believe the death penalty is a violation of basic human rights.

[DreamEater]

[quote="FlipMode"]Yeah but it doesn't make sense... We should not give the death penalty to terrorists? I don't think "it's disrespectful" is a particularly strong argument in this scenario.
We don't have the death penalty here but if we did, if anything merited it then it would be mass murder.[/quote]

Not to be rude, but you obviously aren't catching my point. I said, or typed, I never agreed with the death penalty law. Even if thousands of others were killed by the terrorist, I still don't think they should die in return for it. Maybe it was a wrong word choice to use, but that's what I think. If you don't agree, so be it, I don't need to agree with you either. But you saying tht my statement doesn't make sense is when you're wrong. To me, it makes sense, and so it makes sense, if it doesn't make sense to you, you simply don't understand. Again, none of this is supposed to be rude or offensive, but I need to make my point clear.

[Regulus]

[quote="Azdgari"]I do agree with you however: I believe the death penalty is a violation of basic human rights.[/quote]

So is being a terrorist.

[Azdgari]

In my opinion, human rights cannot be revoked, or else they are not human rights.

[DGFone]

[quote="Azdgari"]In my opinion, human rights cannot be revoked, or else they are not human rights.[/quote]

If you kill someone else in a terrorist attack, you violated their most obvious human right, and therefore automatically revoked yours.