[quote="Regulus"][quote="Woeler1"][quote="DGFone"]
Just because one member made a mistake, doesn't mean that everyone else should suffer the consequences. If one member abuses the chat section, they need to be told that what they did was wrong and not to do it again.[/quote]
Biggest problem: THIS is not happening... and maybe if it did happen it should solve the problem. The point is, it isn't happening. (and if it is being done... it somehow fails horribly...)
Then at least someone who spams useless ''stuff'' 3 or 4 times should be getting a warning.[/quote]
Posting useless "stuff" isn't against the rules.[/quote]
Then add it to the rules, discus it.
this is code red/code retard!
Using previous memberHQ threads system
Hi! Welcome to the Feedback forum.
Before reading anything or asking anything; please check out the FAQs. Your question might be in there. However if you want a better understanding after reading the FAQs, like if it didn't explain it good enough, then by all means ask your question.
Please read the following before posting in this forum...
In this forum you will see an Announcement, and several "sticky" topics. The announcement is the Universal Board Rules. If you are new, read this before doing anything else! The sticky topics will stay above and separated from normal user-made topics in the forum. This is because they outline important information about the board. If you see a sticky topic concerning your issue, please reply with your question or concern in the correct topic. Moderators will see your reply within these topics. Before asking your question, be sure to read the topic and its first page especially. It contains information about your issue that is valuable and may even answer your questions. If the topic does not answer your question, ask your question within the topic, not the forum. If no sticky topic concerns your issue, then you are welcome to ask your own questions by creating a new topic within the forum.
Thank you for keeping the Board Help forum organized!
Before reading anything or asking anything; please check out the FAQs. Your question might be in there. However if you want a better understanding after reading the FAQs, like if it didn't explain it good enough, then by all means ask your question.
Please read the following before posting in this forum...
In this forum you will see an Announcement, and several "sticky" topics. The announcement is the Universal Board Rules. If you are new, read this before doing anything else! The sticky topics will stay above and separated from normal user-made topics in the forum. This is because they outline important information about the board. If you see a sticky topic concerning your issue, please reply with your question or concern in the correct topic. Moderators will see your reply within these topics. Before asking your question, be sure to read the topic and its first page especially. It contains information about your issue that is valuable and may even answer your questions. If the topic does not answer your question, ask your question within the topic, not the forum. If no sticky topic concerns your issue, then you are welcome to ask your own questions by creating a new topic within the forum.
Thank you for keeping the Board Help forum organized!
Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system
by Woeler » September 3rd, 2012, 8:44 pm
There are those who complain about the wind, there are those who hope the wind will change, --though the wise-- the wise adjust their sails.
-
Woeler
- Posts: 4936
- Joined: August 29th, 2011, 2:10 pm
- Location: Always on the move
- Gender: Male
- Pride Points: 120
Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system
by Regulus » September 3rd, 2012, 8:47 pm
But should it be?
Useless stuff is very hard to specifically define. It's a point of view.
Useless stuff is very hard to specifically define. It's a point of view.
-
Regulus
Is differentiable...
But convergence is not guaranteed.
- Posts: 10994
- Joined: September 29th, 2011, 1:19 am
- Location: W⋅N²=(40.498°)³, W²⋅N=(57.345°)³
- Nickname(s): Reg, Regs, Last Person to Post
- Gender: Male
- Pride Points: 206
Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system
by Woeler » September 3rd, 2012, 8:48 pm
[quote="Regulus"]But should it be?
Useless stuff is very hard to specifically define. It's a point of view.[/quote]
Various topics were clearly below the averige level of intelligence...
Useless stuff is very hard to specifically define. It's a point of view.[/quote]
Various topics were clearly below the averige level of intelligence...
There are those who complain about the wind, there are those who hope the wind will change, --though the wise-- the wise adjust their sails.
-
Woeler
- Posts: 4936
- Joined: August 29th, 2011, 2:10 pm
- Location: Always on the move
- Gender: Male
- Pride Points: 120
Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system
by Tabby » September 3rd, 2012, 8:48 pm
[quote="Khanu"][quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"]Just as woeler say, Is it really impossible to deal with the members that spam TLK sections?, I mean, is it really THAT hard to delate the post and warm the person? =/[/quote]
Isn't that the opposite of what you were advocating for earlier? So it's ok for mods to clean up the TLK sections but not the den?[/quote]
Yes, but one thing different from what Tora was saying is that I'm looking for a new rule to regulate this spam, instead Tora wants to keep with it let more spam to get generated. I think if less Spam is made, it'll make things easier for mods.
Isn't that the opposite of what you were advocating for earlier? So it's ok for mods to clean up the TLK sections but not the den?[/quote]
Yes, but one thing different from what Tora was saying is that I'm looking for a new rule to regulate this spam, instead Tora wants to keep with it let more spam to get generated. I think if less Spam is made, it'll make things easier for mods.
Victory, at last!
-
Tabby
Back from the ashes
- Posts: 5360
- Joined: May 9th, 2011, 3:50 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
- Nickname(s): Deess, LxL, Jose, Bean, Burrito
- Gender: Male
- Pride Points: 103
Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system
by Regulus » September 3rd, 2012, 8:48 pm
Oh, sorry, I forgot only members of MENSA could join MLK.
-
Regulus
Is differentiable...
But convergence is not guaranteed.
- Posts: 10994
- Joined: September 29th, 2011, 1:19 am
- Location: W⋅N²=(40.498°)³, W²⋅N=(57.345°)³
- Nickname(s): Reg, Regs, Last Person to Post
- Gender: Male
- Pride Points: 206
Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system
by Khanu » September 3rd, 2012, 8:50 pm
[quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"]I think if less Spam is made, it'll make things easier for mods.[/quote]
It will be easier to clean up for the mods, but not easier to enforce. That's like saying it'll be easier for the garbagemen to collect trash if we have strict trash laws that the police enforce.
It will be easier to clean up for the mods, but not easier to enforce. That's like saying it'll be easier for the garbagemen to collect trash if we have strict trash laws that the police enforce.
-
Khanu
- Posts: 5364
- Joined: May 12th, 2012, 2:40 am
- Nickname(s): Uncle Kuna, Kuny, KunaTuna
- Gender: Male
- Pride Points: 25
Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system
by Tora » September 3rd, 2012, 8:51 pm
[quote="Khanu"][quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"]I think if less Spam is made, it'll make things easier for mods.[/quote]
It will be easier to clean up for the mods, but not easier to enforce. That's like saying it'll be easier for the garbagemen to collect trash if we have strict trash laws that the police enforce.[/quote]
[quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"][quote="Khanu"][quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"]Just as woeler say, Is it really impossible to deal with the members that spam TLK sections?, I mean, is it really THAT hard to delate the post and warm the person? =/[/quote]
Isn't that the opposite of what you were advocating for earlier? So it's ok for mods to clean up the TLK sections but not the den?[/quote]
Yes, but one thing different from what Tora was saying is that I'm looking for a new rule to regulate this spam, instead Tora wants to keep with it let more spam to get generated. I think if less Spam is made, it'll make things easier for mods.[/quote]
Here is your problem; the spam will not be less it will just be moved from one section to the other.
It will be easier to clean up for the mods, but not easier to enforce. That's like saying it'll be easier for the garbagemen to collect trash if we have strict trash laws that the police enforce.[/quote]
[quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"][quote="Khanu"][quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"]Just as woeler say, Is it really impossible to deal with the members that spam TLK sections?, I mean, is it really THAT hard to delate the post and warm the person? =/[/quote]
Isn't that the opposite of what you were advocating for earlier? So it's ok for mods to clean up the TLK sections but not the den?[/quote]
Yes, but one thing different from what Tora was saying is that I'm looking for a new rule to regulate this spam, instead Tora wants to keep with it let more spam to get generated. I think if less Spam is made, it'll make things easier for mods.[/quote]
Here is your problem; the spam will not be less it will just be moved from one section to the other.
-
Tora
Never Forget
Always Remain Hopeful
- Posts: 22359
- Joined: May 25th, 2012, 4:10 am
- Location: Acherus: The Ebon Hold
- Nickname(s): Tim; Torasaur; T-saur; Rora; Goku
- Gender: Male
- Pride Points: 129
Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system
by Tabby » September 3rd, 2012, 8:53 pm
I don't know if it is any possible to make people stop posting useless stuff, but if we prevent MLK from getting new members that come here only to post those, then something's being done.
Khanu, who's the moderator watching the chatroom?, I mean, as I can see, technology is advanced enough to do it automatically, or not?
and Tora: try to TALK in a TLK thread
, even then, is easier to keep one little section clear from a Spam which will be hard to generate, cause lol, I don't think it is any easier to make spam like the one made on the den in sections about TLK.
Khanu, who's the moderator watching the chatroom?, I mean, as I can see, technology is advanced enough to do it automatically, or not?
and Tora: try to TALK in a TLK thread
, even then, is easier to keep one little section clear from a Spam which will be hard to generate, cause lol, I don't think it is any easier to make spam like the one made on the den in sections about TLK.Victory, at last!
-
Tabby
Back from the ashes
- Posts: 5360
- Joined: May 9th, 2011, 3:50 pm
- Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
- Nickname(s): Deess, LxL, Jose, Bean, Burrito
- Gender: Male
- Pride Points: 103
Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system
by Tora » September 3rd, 2012, 8:55 pm
I do talk in TLK threads... You just aren't paying attention. 
None the less, it is just as easy to spam in TLK threads as in the Den. Infact this topic is suppose to be about Member HQ and now were on the Den.
You just aren't paying attention. None the less, it is just as easy to spam in TLK threads as in the Den. Infact this topic is suppose to be about Member HQ and now were on the Den.-
Tora
Never Forget
Always Remain Hopeful
- Posts: 22359
- Joined: May 25th, 2012, 4:10 am
- Location: Acherus: The Ebon Hold
- Nickname(s): Tim; Torasaur; T-saur; Rora; Goku
- Gender: Male
- Pride Points: 129
Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system
by Khanu » September 3rd, 2012, 8:56 pm
[quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"]I don't know if it is any possible to make people stop posting useless stuff, but if we prevent MLK from getting new members that come here only to post those, then something's being done.[/quote]
Are you saying that people come to MyLionKing.com/Forum to only post in their own chat thread and the "How are you feeling" topic...
[quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"]Khanu, who's the moderator watching the chatroom?, I mean, as I can see, technology is advanced enough to do it automatically, or not?[/quote]
Technology is advanced to do what?
That made no sense lol
Are you saying that people come to MyLionKing.com/Forum to only post in their own chat thread and the "How are you feeling" topic...
[quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"]Khanu, who's the moderator watching the chatroom?, I mean, as I can see, technology is advanced enough to do it automatically, or not?[/quote]
Technology is advanced to do what?
That made no sense lol-
Khanu
- Posts: 5364
- Joined: May 12th, 2012, 2:40 am
- Nickname(s): Uncle Kuna, Kuny, KunaTuna
- Gender: Male
- Pride Points: 25
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests
- The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC [ DST ]