by BlitzRogue » February 10th, 2012, 2:23 am
[quote="FromNZbrotha"]dude, at 1987 they searched for 5 days with 20 boats in the lake for the monster, and they found 3 big moving objects at a dept of between 150 and 180 meters, but the search had to be called of due a lack of money. at an expidition in 2000 they also found a big object from about 5 meters long with sonar, but before they could check out what it was, they lost it. these facts conclude there is/was something big in that lake, enough said. they only lack evidence that it is a plesiosaur because it hasn't been FOUND. but there indeed is or was ''something'' big living in that waters, or it IS/WAS at least possible there was something. And that beast is likely to enter and leave the lake if it can't find any food.[/quote]
The 1987 search revealed a 3 "things" in the lake, which were all concluded to be anything from a seal to a group of salmon swimming together. And google has no knowledge of this expedition in 2000, so if you could provide some citation for that, it'd be appreciated.
[quote="FromNZbrotha"]So now I am a liar all of a sudden? you surely seem to be someone who takes conclusions about others very quickly.[/quote]
When you say one thing, and then say something else that negates the first statement, it's called a contradiction. In other words: lying. So, yes, that would in fact make you a liar. It's not exactly a difficult conclusion to come to... >.>
Also, accusing me of jumping to conclusions too quickly whilst simultaneously jumping to conclusions about me is not an effective way to make a point.
[quote="FromNZbrotha"]but better be carefull what you say. there may be certain persons dwelling arround here who won't take this kindly. especially if we won't accept science as our ''god''.[/quote]
Cute. However, I'm fairly certain this isn't a thread about religion, so I'd recommend you keep your potshots at atheism, and your preconceived notions about atheists, out of it. Thanks.