things in TLK are hardly meant to be totally scientifically or factually accurate.
things in TLK are hardly meant to be totally scientifically or factually accurate.





























SnowyCheetah wrote:As well as things like all the lions having the ability to speak...things in TLK are hardly meant to be totally scientifically or factually accurate.
Jiirani wrote:I think PK is right there x3 I mean hair tufts would grow in at different rates depending on the lion right? x3
Everything doesn't have to be correct, i is just a movie x3
and lol at SnowyCheeta's siggy xD I really shouldn't have started that 'I support Kopa as Canon' thing rofl x3

















PrincessKiara wrote:and lol at SnowyCheeta's siggy xD I really shouldn't have started that 'I support Kopa as Canon' thing rofl x3
[/quote]













SnowyCheetah wrote:So in other words, once he supports your argument, he becomes relevant and then irrelevant again when he no longer does.
Jiirani wrote:Everything doesn't have to be correct, i is just a movie x3
SnowyCheetah wrote:As well as things like all the lions having the ability to speak...things in TLK are hardly meant to be totally scientifically or factually accurate.
Jiirani wrote:I think PK is right there x3 I mean hair tufts would grow in at different rates depending on the lion right? x3
PrincessKiara wrote:SBS: I know the writers and animators studied lions when making TLK and SP.. But to be perfectly honest, I think they took certain artistic liberties. Such as giving Kopa a head tuft to give him a more individual look compared to Cub Simba. Just because Kopa and Kovu have head tufts doesn`t HAVE to mean that they are at a certain age in the movies/books.
Just a thought.
















SuperBabySimba wrote:Jiirani wrote:Everything doesn't have to be correct, i is just a movie x3
Basically you're right, but in this case, I'd say everything has to be thought of in realistic terms, even though it's just a movie. Why? Because both film's makers made a big deal about how they studied lions and all the animals during the production. As in they obviously want us to learn and know about realistic biology and interpret their designs and timelines accoording to it. Hm?

Jiirani wrote:I think PK is right there x3 I mean hair tufts would grow in at different rates depending on the lion right? x3














SuperBabySimba wrote:SnowyCheetah wrote:So in other words, once he supports your argument, he becomes relevant and then irrelevant again when he no longer does.
No, Kopa is relevant to this discussion through the other people's opinions/arguments. Hence, I wouldn't have brought Kopa into my argument if no one else had brought him up first. I would've just pointed out the timeline making older siblings in general, impossible. Thus, he's relevant because he exists in this discussion, and not because he supports my own argument.Jiirani wrote:Everything doesn't have to be correct, i is just a movie x3
Basically you're right, but in this case, I'd say everything has to be thought of in realistic terms, even though it's just a movie. Why? Because both film's makers made a big deal about how they studied lions and all the animals during the production. As in they obviously want us to learn and know about realistic biology and interpret their designs and timelines accoording to it. Hm?SnowyCheetah wrote:As well as things like all the lions having the ability to speak...things in TLK are hardly meant to be totally scientifically or factually accurate.
They talk because they have to in order for it to become humane and toldable story.Jiirani wrote:I think PK is right there x3 I mean hair tufts would grow in at different rates depending on the lion right? x3
Valid point but let's not forget that people are trying to turn Fluffy into Kopa while Kovu's and Fluffy's age difference would be around a year, which just is too much even for individual growth rates, seeing to that Kovu and Kopa look exactly the same age.
Two or three, four months tops, perhaps would yet pass realistically and make it posisble for them to have exactly the same size tuft if we consider individual rates. But a year? Hell no. And why it would have to be a year is becausee there is no way Pridelands could've recovered that much in just a few months. It would take seasons. And even if we pretend it was possible, Nala would've carried the child those three to four months from Kovu's birth, and then to that should be added many months of growth which would still make Kovu too much older for them to look the same age.PrincessKiara wrote:SBS: I know the writers and animators studied lions when making TLK and SP.. But to be perfectly honest, I think they took certain artistic liberties. Such as giving Kopa a head tuft to give him a more individual look compared to Cub Simba. Just because Kopa and Kovu have head tufts doesn`t HAVE to mean that they are at a certain age in the movies/books.
Just a thought.
Well, I see your point but the biological development of lions apply to the design the film makers made, as long as the fact that they studied lions is all we know and they even put weight on it in their commentaries and making-of documents.
As for Kopa's creators who aren't known to have studied lions and your point may be correct, the head tuft still makes Kopa around 2 years old seeing to the realistic biology which is all we know to apply for the film's story. As in, if Kopa was added into the film's story, he would turn into being the same age as Kovu, no matter why Kopa had the head tuft in the first place.

















Jiirani wrote:Is it not just that he only has the one cub?
In the movie [SP] it's Kiara
In the books [6NA] it's Kopa
and at the end of the first movie [TLK] it's Fluffy.
They just had one cub altogether though, just three different versions through different pairs of eyes. Does that make sense?



































Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests