FlipMode wrote:Unless you mean the effects it apparently has on the bill of rights, in which case yeah I agree. lol
Yes, I meant this. LOL
FlipMode wrote:Unless you mean the effects it apparently has on the bill of rights, in which case yeah I agree. lol














FlipMode wrote:A link to prove it false? The article in the OP did not even provide a link to back up what THEY were saying lol. But since you are asking - http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtex ... =h112-1540
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 wrote:(e) Authorities- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 wrote:(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.















































Thegeni99 wrote:LOL YAY. So we are safe and no such things will be done. You guys can just call me out, no need to write OP. Never said it was real or fake, just left it to you guys. I am glad FM found the link to the original bill. Now that my link has been completely contradicted, I guess you can say I'm INB4LOCK.
Next time you might want to base your news on more reputable sources lol.































Thegeni99 wrote:LOL YAY. So we are safe and no such things will be done. You guys can just call me out, no need to write OP. Never said it was real or fake, just left it to you guys. I am glad FM found the link to the original bill. Now that my link has been completely contradicted, I guess you can say I'm INB4LOCK.

















Thegeni99 wrote:LOL YAY. So we are safe and no such things will be done. You guys can just call me out, no need to write OP. Never said it was real or fake, just left it to you guys. I am glad FM found the link to the original bill. Now that my link has been completely contradicted, I guess you can say I'm INB4LOCK.













































Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 470 guests