Are the characters, um, "clothed"?

[Claws]

I think we humans created the definition of being "naked", because we're supposedly the only "reasoning" beings and therefore we feel shame and all, but animals wouldn't thik of it, like they're busy with other more important matters. Now that said I personally don't see them "naked" or "clothed", I see them as animals, animated animals, like what else could them be? lol

[cleargreenwater]

.....


Damn it, Wally, put that biscuit down and go put on some clothing, you exhibitionist!

[SophieCub]

I guess it would look quite silly if they wore clothes, since lions and other animals don't wear clothes in real life. Unless some dogs have.. strange, cruel owners. x3

[RedKite]

Seriously, am I really reading this topic? Ok, so firstly: Do they wear clothes? NO! That does not mean they are naked, they are all covered in fur, which, if you want to think about it as 'wearing fur' then it is like wearing a onesie.

Secondly, CYFTLT is NOT in anyway explicit or provocative, Disney are a children's company, would they really put that in a kid's film? If you think that it is, then that is your opinion. It has to be checked for this sort of stuff, so no, it isn't explicit. Nala's facial expression is provocative IF you think of it like that...

[Regulus]

This is getting out of hand. Locked for obvious reasons. If you have any questions, please PM me.

[DGFone]

[quote="Regulus"]This is getting out of hand. Locked for obvious reasons. [/quote]

Umm, Okay...

So anyways, back to the topic.