Using previous memberHQ threads system

[Shadowfax]

I personally think just one chat thread would be sufficient. I mean, if you want to chat... Go on MSN or Skype xD

[Arani]

While I am for changing nothing, let's wait for Moka to read this... largely spammed topic and decide what to do with his forum.

Don't you see guys? You are complaining about spam, and in this very topic, roughly half the posts are spam. It's not the system that is at fault here, but people. Grow up already.

THANK YOU! Finally someone who says something worthwhile.

[Tabby]

I must say I'd like what Woeler says to be done, but we can't be that much harsh, I guess.. So why not take the solution 4, and regulating also the Q&a threads somehow.. I mean, make 30-40 posts on tlk sections, be here for at least 2 months and you'll have a guaranted right to create a Q&A thread(without limitating them to post in the other OT sections, just preventing them from making these QA threads.), also delating them after 90 days of inactivity.

[Azdgari]

So do you guys like chocolate chip muffins or blueberry? I'm a cc man myself...

[Shadowfax]

sorry to come off this annoyed, but really, are 11 pages of arguments really necessary?

Yes, because we want to solve this in a democratic way. There is no hate, this is an intelligent discussion.

True. I don't think anything said has been classed as an 'argument' We are merely putting suggestions forward and giving ideas on how to help prevent spammers.

I like blueberry =D

[Arani]

sorry to come off this annoyed, but really, are 11 pages of arguments really necessary?

Yes, because we want to solve this in a democratic way. There is no hate, this is an intelligent discussion.

True. I don't think anything said has been classed as an 'argument' We are merely putting suggestions forward and giving ideas on how to help prevent spammers.

I like blueberry =D

x) Well sorry, but I classify this as arguments. Pointless arguments.

[Azdgari]

I like blueberry =D

Really? I've never been big into them. As a morning thing, or more afternoon?

[Khanu]

^


Thirteen pages and we've made little progress. This must be how Congress works lol.

But on a serious note, why should we delete old topics? People might find them on Google searches in the future. I know I did. so why remove them forever?

[Tora]

Solution 4: Eliminate all member chat threads, and replace with a few general chat threads

Pros:
will completely eliminate many pointless threads from ever being created in the HQ
does not give mods more power

Cons:
???

Try

1. Elimination of freedom.
2. Suppress people to post in Lion King Related topics only.
3. Resentment towards staff.
4. Overall complete boredom on the forum.
5. Potential to cause members to leave.


I just want to come to a compromise that majority of people will be happy with. The arguing is a bit out of hand yes, but that is exactly what happens in a democracy. I am not out to start arguments either, but lets try to come to a consensus about this. Doesn't this feel like Congress already?

This must be how Congress works lol.

Ninja! I didn't hit post in time.

[DGFone]

It's actually pretty ridiculous how mods need approval of the community for their actions. I have never ever in my life been on a forum that had that kind of system.

There was already a time when the mods here acted against the approval of the general membership. It was not pretty. Seriously, guys, all of you. YES, YOU. All you guys are doing right now is bickering and spamming. Close this topic, move on, and wait. You don't need to repeat yourself another 500 times, you don't need to say something completely different. This is not Monty Python here.

So wait for Moka, and see what he will decide. This is his website, not yours.