Using previous memberHQ threads system

Hi! Welcome to the Feedback forum.
Before reading anything or asking anything; please check out the FAQs. Your question might be in there. However if you want a better understanding after reading the FAQs, like if it didn't explain it good enough, then by all means ask your question.

Please read the following before posting in this forum...

In this forum you will see an Announcement, and several "sticky" topics. The announcement is the Universal Board Rules. If you are new, read this before doing anything else! The sticky topics will stay above and separated from normal user-made topics in the forum. This is because they outline important information about the board. If you see a sticky topic concerning your issue, please reply with your question or concern in the correct topic. Moderators will see your reply within these topics. Before asking your question, be sure to read the topic and its first page especially. It contains information about your issue that is valuable and may even answer your questions. If the topic does not answer your question, ask your question within the topic, not the forum. If no sticky topic concerns your issue, then you are welcome to ask your own questions by creating a new topic within the forum.

Thank you for keeping the Board Help forum organized!

Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system

Postby Tora » September 3rd, 2012, 9:32 pm

Woeler1 wrote:
Tora wrote:No in fact you are taking the wrong assumption. I am saying that totalitarianism is when you force upon people to do as you wish regardless of what your people believe and feel. To establish rules based on what few believe while the majority is against it.

Totalitarianism is when the government (or in this case the mods) controll everything, literally everything. MLK is FAR FROM THAT.

This is like a backup check before immigrants can enter the country. Something most if not all developed countries do!

If rules like this are established it will not be long before more and more will be established until it turns toward one. Are you unaware that everything has consequences?
Tora
Never Forget

User avatar

Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership

Always Remain Hopeful

Posts: 22360
Joined: May 25th, 2012, 4:10 am
Location: Acherus: The Ebon Hold
Nickname(s): Tim; Torasaur; T-saur; Rora; Goku
Gender: Male
Pride Points: 129

Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system

Postby Tabby » September 3rd, 2012, 9:34 pm

I've got an idea, let's take away all the rules cause they could lead the staff to set more rules. ALL USING TORA'S LOGIC, LOL.

And well, since consequenses so far aren't completly good, for the current way things are going, I think it worths a try to improve the conditions, right?
Last edited by Tabby on September 3rd, 2012, 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Victory, at last!
Tabby
Back from the ashes

User avatar

Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership

Posts: 5360
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 3:50 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Nickname(s): Deess, LxL, Jose, Bean, Burrito
Gender: Male
Pride Points: 103

Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system

Postby Regulus » September 3rd, 2012, 9:34 pm

Tora wrote:The argument is about regulating and placing limits on what people can post in.


That is my solution.

Tora wrote:You are moving toward pointless threads.


And that, pointless threads, are the problem.

Tora wrote:Setting strict rules when most people find the current system to be fine is definitely not right.


No, most people don't think the current system is right.



Problem Statement: Many new members are joining the forum and doing nothing but creating pointless threads in the den and member HQ.

Statement of Purpose: To reduce the number of pointless threads.

Solution 1: Prevent new members from being able to create OT threads until certain conditions have been met.

Solution 2: Change nothing, but continue to lock the pointless threads that are occasionally created.

Solution 3: Modify the rules so that members can be banned for creating threads that are deemed pointless.

Solution 4: ???
Regulus
Is differentiable...

User avatar

Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership

But convergence is not guaranteed.

Posts: 10994
Joined: September 29th, 2011, 1:19 am
Location: W⋅N²=(40.498°)³, W²⋅N=(57.345°)³
Nickname(s): Reg, Regs, Last Person to Post
Gender: Male
Pride Points: 206

Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system

Postby Tabby » September 3rd, 2012, 9:36 pm

A mix of 1 and 2. Please x)
Image

Victory, at last!
Tabby
Back from the ashes

User avatar

Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership

Posts: 5360
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 3:50 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Nickname(s): Deess, LxL, Jose, Bean, Burrito
Gender: Male
Pride Points: 103

Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system

Postby Khanu » September 3rd, 2012, 9:36 pm

Regulus wrote:Problem Statement: Many new members are joining the forum and doing nothing but creating pointless threads in the den and member HQ.

Statement of Purpose: To reduce the number of pointless threads.

Solution 1: Prevent new members from being able to create OT threads until certain conditions have been met.

Solution 2: Change nothing, but continue to lock the pointless threads that are occasionally created.

Solution 3: Modify the rules so that members can be banned for creating threads deemed pointless.

Solution 4: ???

You rock as a mod LOL
Image
Me: show
Image

True Love: show
Image
Khanu
User avatar

Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership

Posts: 5364
Joined: May 12th, 2012, 2:40 am
Nickname(s): Uncle Kuna, Kuny, KunaTuna
Gender: Male
Pride Points: 25

Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system

Postby Tora » September 3rd, 2012, 9:38 pm

SimbaCanHazDonut wrote:I've got an idea, let's take away all the rules cause they could lead the staff to set more rules. ALL USING TORA'S LOGIC, LOL.

And well, since consequenses so far aren't completly good, for the current way things are going, I think it worths a try to improve the conditions, right?

:-o Seriously? Come back with something worth reading.

How bout solution 4:
Add spam to the list of rules; which it lacks.
Establish discipline for those that break the rules in place.
Problem solved.
Tora
Never Forget

User avatar

Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership

Always Remain Hopeful

Posts: 22360
Joined: May 25th, 2012, 4:10 am
Location: Acherus: The Ebon Hold
Nickname(s): Tim; Torasaur; T-saur; Rora; Goku
Gender: Male
Pride Points: 129

Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system

Postby Regulus » September 3rd, 2012, 9:39 pm

^ That is solution 3.

And that's what I'd call a totalitarian system.
Regulus
Is differentiable...

User avatar

Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership

But convergence is not guaranteed.

Posts: 10994
Joined: September 29th, 2011, 1:19 am
Location: W⋅N²=(40.498°)³, W²⋅N=(57.345°)³
Nickname(s): Reg, Regs, Last Person to Post
Gender: Male
Pride Points: 206

Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system

Postby Khanu » September 3rd, 2012, 9:40 pm

Tora wrote:
SimbaCanHazDonut wrote:I've got an idea, let's take away all the rules cause they could lead the staff to set more rules. ALL USING TORA'S LOGIC, LOL.

And well, since consequenses so far aren't completly good, for the current way things are going, I think it worths a try to improve the conditions, right?

:-o Seriously? Come back with something worth reading.

How bout solution 4:
Add spam to the list of rules; which it lacks.
Establish discipline for those that break the rules in place.
Problem solved.

Be nice to him. English isn't his first language lol.

I like one and two the best. A combo would work wonders
Image
Me: show
Image

True Love: show
Image
Khanu
User avatar

Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership

Posts: 5364
Joined: May 12th, 2012, 2:40 am
Nickname(s): Uncle Kuna, Kuny, KunaTuna
Gender: Male
Pride Points: 25

Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system

Postby Tabby » September 3rd, 2012, 9:41 pm

Tora wrote:
SimbaCanHazDonut wrote:I've got an idea, let's take away all the rules cause they could lead the staff to set more rules. ALL USING TORA'S LOGIC, LOL.

And well, since consequenses so far aren't completly good, for the current way things are going, I think it worths a try to improve the conditions, right?

:-o Seriously? Come back with something worth reading.

How bout solution 4:
Add spam to the list of rules; which it lacks.
Establish discipline for those that break the rules in place.
Problem solved.


Let's see... you want to establish discipline by letting people post Spam.
DAT LOGIC.
Image

Victory, at last!
Tabby
Back from the ashes

User avatar

Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership

Posts: 5360
Joined: May 9th, 2011, 3:50 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Nickname(s): Deess, LxL, Jose, Bean, Burrito
Gender: Male
Pride Points: 103

Re: Using previous memberHQ threads system

Postby Shadowfax » September 3rd, 2012, 9:42 pm

I honestly do not see the point in loads of chat threads. Where did they all come from all of a sudden? I post in Tora's occasionally, but that is about it. Sometimes it's the same people posting in various threads about the same things. With regards to the chatting, maybe we should have an official Community thread that can be pinned and people could use that as the 'chat thread'. That way, at least it's restricted to the one thread and if you so wish, you can chat there instead of MSN etc and you won't get little groups formed and everyone can get involved.

With regards to the questions and answers threads. I don't see any harm in that. It's in a subforum and is not 'in the way' as such where as the chat threads are pushing more important threads to the bottom where people will not be able to see them.
Shadowfax
Never give up;

User avatar

Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership

And good luck will find you.

Posts: 18935
Joined: March 20th, 2012, 3:48 pm
Location: Gran Pulse.
Pride Points: 182

PreviousNext

Return to Feedback & How-To

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests