Something I Find Odd/Funny...

[atouchofgrace]

[quote="Jiirani"]Even Disney's lawers aren't that good xD And considering Disney did try and prevent the Kimba movie that was coming out in 1998 from being shown [/quote]

Exactly. During Aladdin's production, A company owned by Disney at the time got the rights to "The Princess and the Cobbler" (kicking out the director who was planning the movie for 30 years and was supposed to release it before Aladdin).
The two stories are similar (the story takes place in an oriental city from the tales of thousand and one night. It's about a poor cobbler who falls for the princess. She wants to be free and is tired of her life and falls for the cobbler. But the vizier wants to marry the princess in order to succeed her father)

The Princess and the Cobbler was completly changed and released in 1993. It was given a limited release and was called the "Aladdin rip-off". In 2009, the movie was finally restored and made the way the original director wanted.

[Jiirani]

It's good it was made the way it was meant to be :3 Gosh, the similarities though o3o

[quote="Chumvikingpride"]Nevertheless, it would have been funny to see scar instead of mufasa

A small guy who leads a Kingdom, and the robust mufasa brother who will try to kill him[/quote]

That, my friend, would make a good fanfiction. If you swapped Mufasa and Scar's roles x3

[Chumvikingpride]

[quote="atouchofgrace"]
Exactly. During Aladdin's production, A company owned by Disney at the time got the rights to "The Princess and the Cobbler" (kicking out the director who was planning the movie for 30 years and was supposed to release it before Aladdin).
The two stories are similar (the story takes place in an oriental city from the tales of thousand and one night. It's about a poor cobbler who falls for the princess. She wants to be free and is tired of her life and falls for the cobbler. But the vizier wants to marry the princess in order to succeed her father)

The Princess and the Cobbler was completly changed and released in 1993. It was given a limited release and was called the "Aladdin rip-off". In 2009, the movie was finally restored and made the way the original director wanted.[/quote]
it take their idea books, such as oliver and company, the book of the jungle...



[quote="Jiirani"]It's good it was made the way it was meant to be :3 Gosh, the similarities though o3o

[quote="Chumvikingpride"]Nevertheless, it would have been funny to see scar instead of mufasa

A small guy who leads a Kingdom, and the robust mufasa brother who will try to kill him[/quote]

That, my friend, would make a good fanfiction. If you swapped Mufasa and Scar's roles x3[/quote]

I chose nuka in the simba rôle!

and a small nice zira alsoXD

[Arani]

To stay on topic with the first post, I once heard that a lion with a darker mane is healthier than a lion with a lighter mane... idk if this is true or not though. It's pretty funny though because if that's true Scar should look a lot healthier than he does... idk just a though lol.

and @ the post above mine ^ That would be pretty cool.

[SummerSnowLeopard]

Yes. A male with a black mane is healthier. Scar doesn't look very healthy. Practically skin and bone.

And with the Muffy and Scar changing roles, imagine Mufasa saying "Long live the King" to Scar

[Arani]

Omg that would be funny!

[SummerSnowLeopard]

That would make interesting fanart

[Momotaro]

[quote="Amanda"]You know something else weird? Lions aren't supposed to talk... [/quote]

That made my day. XD

Back on topic, I guess it is true that lions with black manes are more attractive/popular than lions with red manes, but in TLK, I find it true.

[SummerSnowLeopard]

Yea. Its just weird because if TLK were real life, all the females would be madly in love with Scar. When in TLK, they hate is guts!

[iluvnala]

I never really new that. Yet Scar has a black mane and he's lol ans simba is