














Azdgari wrote:Aren't we saying that the staff are looking over and revising the rules? At least, isn't that what Kev proposed and everyone seemed to agree with?
















WildSimba wrote:There are new staff, and new things that could possibly be added. Would a revision really be THAT bad?





















Mike wrote:WildSimba wrote:There are new staff, and new things that could possibly be added. Would a revision really be THAT bad?
There's a difference between sensible revision and pointlessly adding red tape. Your suggestion seems to fall on the red tape side of the issue. Kevin's offer to revise the rules in general sounds good.





















































































Azdgari wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9K4BKkLaCI





















Azdgari wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9K4BKkLaCI
















Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests