If you don't agree with the decision, you're banned.

Anyway, I'm sorry that folks feel that this decision was made unilaterally and are unhappy with it. Really, I am--I didn't anticipate this, and I suppose that's my fault. Short of making a voting topic, which I think is far more the exception than the norm, I guess I'm not really sure how else people were thinking selection would go, especially since the
original topic expressly asked people for input on how the team should be selected (without a ton of specific feedback on that particular front).
If anything, the only thing I reneged on was not choosing a veteran and a newbie. I chose
two veterans from my perspective, and I'm frankly confused how people are pointing to a team of three with 21 cumulative years of membership as "non-veteran", but... yeah.
I appreciate everyone's feedback, and definitely continue to speak your minds, either in this thread or to me individually via PM. The next time a decision like this comes around, hopefully we can make it in a way that leaves everyone feeling better about it.