Using previous memberHQ threads system

[Khanu]

[quote="Regulus"][quote="Tora"][quote="Regulus"]Every member does not need their own chat room.[/quote]
Wither or not they need one doesn't matter; they should have the right to have one.[/quote]

Whether or not anyone has that right is entirely up to Moka. Ultimately, this is his website.[/quote]
He's gonna have a lot of posts to read when he finally gets online. What is this? The 8th page already?

[Regulus]

Tora, you are making the assumption that not being able to create spam threads is totalitarianism. Quite ridiculous, I must say, especially considering that we already have threads dedicated to spam.

[Woeler]

[quote="Tora"]
While I don't speak for him, I am confident he is not one of totalitarianism. I believe he would see everyone's points of view and decide what is best for the forum.[/quote]
Please don't use terms you don't understand. I am on numerous forums and this is by a clear mile te mildest one when it comes to rules and banning...

[Tabby]

Everybody's?, I think we're about a tie hahahaha.

However, I've defended my point as much as i've could. I agree with regulus, Moka's the only one with the right to decide what to do. I don't thik he liked a lot the idea of his forum being spammed, or as regulus said, full of ''random'' posts, but I can't speak for him, I hope more people still agree with my point, and regulus', to find a middle point, where we can have it, without excess.

[Tora]

No in fact you are taking the wrong assumption. I am saying that totalitarianism is when you force upon people to do as you wish regardless of what your people believe and feel. To establish rules based on what few believe while the majority is against it.

[FlipMode]

How will you ever live not knowing what Shadowfax just finished eating? Or what song Kops is listening to, or what I'm thinking RIGHT NOW, or what book Woeler is reading?! How?!

[Khanu]

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. This whole angry debate is worse than the "Random" and "Pointless" threads in the Den in my opinion.

[Regulus]

[quote="Tora"]No in fact you are taking the wrong assumption. I am saying that totalitarianism is when you force upon people to do as you wish regardless of what your people believe and feel. To establish rules based on what few believe while the majority is against it.[/quote]

The majority is against pointless threads being created. 'Nuff said.

[quote="Khanu"]I've said it before, and I'll say it again. This whole angry debate is worse than the "Random" and "Pointless" threads in the Den in my opinion.[/quote]

This debate is the very reason why Tora is wrong. If this was a totalitarian system, there would be no debate.

[quote="LemonMode"]How will you ever live not knowing what Shadowfax just finished eating? Or what song Kops is listening to, or what I'm thinking RIGHT NOW, or what book Woeler is reading?! How?![/quote]

My suggestion wouldn't even eliminate those threads.

[Tora]

What are you even blabbering about? The argument is about regulating and placing limits on what people can post in. You are moving toward pointless threads. Setting strict rules when most people find the current system to be fine is definitely not right.

[quote="Regulus"] If this was a totalitarian system, there would be no debate.[/quote]
I'm saying I don't wish to see it as one. You are assuming that I am calling this forum one which is why you're blabbering.

[Tabby]

BAWWW DUDE I CAN'T REALLY DO 50 POSTS, *has 6874 posts where most are from the den and memberhq*

Dude, how is that even strict?, lol, it's just a little thing, I mean, I don't think that when you join a forum called MyLionKing you plan to go make chat threads and make people ask you stuff, x)