Election Day 2012

[DGFone]

Which is all the more reason why I don't like Obama. People like to say that he is better at international politics than Romney is, and maybe he is when it comes to dealing with friends. But as for enemies: Yes, he did "Kill Osama". More like Osama was discovered while Obama was in charge. And at the same time, Iran is well in progress to build a nuclear weapon.

You said it yourself: Indoctrination is stronger than education. Guess what happens when you have a radical zealot in totalitarian control of a nation with a nuke? Nagasaki will no longer be the last place to get nuked, that's what.

[TheLionPrince]

^Not every MLK user here lives in America and is at least 18 years old, Banana

Anyway, I voted.

[UncoordinatedPisces]

I'm not a huge fan of politics or anything, but I have been reading this thread constantly and realized there are some intelligent people here lol. Where ever Woeler is posting, I tend to read. Anyway, I count myself as a democrat, and I hope to see Obama as President again ^^

[Regulus]

http://www.weather.com/news/election-an ... e-20121104

It's pretty sad when the Weather Channel can make it obvious who I should vote for.

[DGFone]

Woeler: I really do with I had your confidence that if Iran would get a nuke, t won't use it. Iran knows that a traditional war with Israel is impossible, which is why it didn't do anything yet. As for when it gets the bomb, I won't be so sure...

And speaking of Isreal. When you know that one of your neighbors hates your guts and is developing a first-strike weapon, you WILL act. If Obama will let Iran get its nuke, even if Iran promises with all its heart not to use it, there WILL be war in the Middle East, because Israel isn't going to take any chances. With only one nuclear weapon, you can destroy the entire nation. Israel isn't going to sit idle while Iran will make a weapon that it might or might not use.

Regulus: You do know who spends the most on R&D on renewable energy, right? It's those evil gas and oil companies, because they know that oil's reign is ending, and once again, it all comes down to economics: when oil will run out, which energy company will remain? The one that is using renewable energy.

And here in California, the largely government subsidized (HUGE tax-cuts and other benefits for being a 'green company') Solyndra filed for bankruptcy and is now no more. If green tech can't compete yet with oil, and the government can't even keep green tech in business... Give incentive for the big oil companies to invest in R&D instead of taxing the hell out of them just because they are oil companies. Also, keep in mind that higher taxes on oil companies = higher gas prices.

AND YES, GLOBAL WARMING 'SCIENCE' is complete [cencored]. The whole "the planet will get hotter and we will all die" is not only complete nonsense, it's been disproven so many times, it's now a joke among most scientific fields.

So before you tell me that "global warming had been proven..." Stop. Everything you read or heard about about global warming is WRONG. Scientifically PROVEN to be wrong. For example: This year, Antarctica is having an Ice Maximum. According to global warming, there should always be an ice minimum, as the ice melts and goes into the ocean. We don't know what the climate change is doing, we are only beginning to make guesses, and we basically don't know anything yet.

To say that science proved otherwise, it means that you heard pseudoscience. And by the way: I already had a lecture on why global warming is false, using physics to disprove everything that was said about it, but 1. I don't remember most of it, and 2. Non of you will understand it. Definitely not you, Woeler, who will almost certainly tell me that I'm wrong, when you aren't even qualified to do so. I'm not either, but my proof came from those who are.

Just saw some tweets bashing Obama because he is an African-American. Making fun of slavery and such. Those people deserve a highfive .... In the face .... With a buckshot shotgunshell.

Believe it or not, but while Obama didn't 'make fun' of slavery, he DID have severe racist undertones in a speech he made in a democratic meeting. Also, didn't you want to ban all guns? A bit hypocritical there, isn't it....

[Dark Huntress]

I have to make a small statement here: Iran probably would nuke Israel unless they were in the process if being nuked, since the fallout would be pushed back on them (if what someone told me was true)-I'd be more worried about them nuking America...

[Dark Huntress]

I never they did have nukes, all I'm saying is I'd be MORE worried about them nuking America...

[DGFone]

1. Why would Iran be making nuclear reactor for 'energy purposes' when we all know it doesn't need that extra energy. And WE DO KNOW THAT IT'S CREATING THEM. As for no nukes: No nukes YET. Look up IR-40.

2. Why the hell is Iran perusing Enriched Uranium (which IS a fact), when there is only one use for that stuff: nuclear weaponry. There is another name for enriched Uranium: weapons-grade. Guess why.

3. I don't have a source, but I do have relatives in Israel. I think I would know better what that nation is doing now than you. Such as the fact that Israel is preparing to EMP Iran if Iran won't go to the talking table.

4. Your neighbor just told you that you don't have a right to exist. That neighbor is creating a nuclear weapon. What are you going to do?

[Nukascar1]

I never they did have nukes, all I'm saying is I'd be MORE worried about them nuking America...

I don't think they'd be that stupid the only reason North Korea and Iran haven't bothered nuking the US is because the US has far more just like the cold war. But then again a lot of countries have nukes even the UK does sleep easy.

[DGFone]

And I want to see your source that says that Iran is not making any nukes. Go on, I dare you. Because the dots connect to either nukes already in development, or an ambition to start making one very soon.

So do tell me how Iran is not even wanting to make a nuke. Show me.