GeminiGemelo wrote:^ I likely would too, but third parties like that have no chance of winning.
Really, my vote is wasted regardless of who I cast it for. I won't get any preferred candidate.Kops wrote:GeminiGemelo wrote:This is probably going to be responsible for most of the votes she gets in November. I think hardly anyone had her as their first choice.
I'm just so... disappointed. The only politicians that were running for candidates that had any hope of changing the political status quo were Bernie and Trump, and naturally Hillary overshadowed Bernie. Don't get me wrong, I don't think Bernie would be God's given gift to America but if he was being honest about what he wanted to change it would have been a step forward. (Provided congress didn't hold him back, ugh.)
Trump is likely to change the status quo... and take a step backwards. Not good.
I agree with this. Not to mention that Bernie had so much popular support, but we still got Hillary anyway.
But I guess that's to be expected. She has the money, after all.
If the Green Party gets at least 2.5% of the vote, then they get federal funding and are allowed to participate in debates in the following election cycle. Of course there's no way Jill Stein would win, but at this point it's not about winning. It's about bringing down the two-party system.




Wow....








