Kops wrote:Honestly I've always supported parental licenses. We need licenses to drive cars safely, why don't we need licenses to raise the next generation when the consequences of raising children wrong range from low-self-confidence to full blown traumas and abuse? It's nonsensical.
People need training and liscensing to drive cars because land transport infrastructure is built to exacting standards. Drive on one side of the road. U-turns are only legal in certain circumstances. Traffic signals are standardised. Et cetera.
Raising a child is something completely subject to the parent. There are thousands of cultures on this planet, each with different philosophies on life - Child-rearing being an aspect of such. To implement a parenting-liscensing scheme is to enforce one particular philosophy on child-rearing, and completely stripping away culture.
Whether you claim someone's child-rearing philosophy is retarded or not is your own belief. I too believe that there are many dumb parents out there who do stupid crap, but ultimately it's their fault if their child turns out to be stupid crap as well. Nobody has any right to enforce any culture onto another person.
Kops wrote:If you can't raise a child you shouldn't be having it in the first place.
By whose authority? You want to pick and choose who gets to raise a child and who doesn't? This is some 1984-level totalitarian regime stuff right here.