by Regulus » December 10th, 2012, 8:16 pm
I'm basically going to reiterate what I said before:
Friendship is based primarily off of trust, and trust requires time to form.
On the internet, nobody knows who you really are. But isn't real life the same way? How do you know that guy behind you isn't a serial killer?
It's all about time. If you've known someone for a few years, it's easy to get a good idea of what the person is like, and how they act in various situations. It's at that point where, if the person was a cereal killer, you probably would have found out one way or another.
Why are online friends any different? They're not. The only difference is that the person isn't physically there.
Personally, I think it's pretty shallow to need to meet someone in person before considering them a friend, although it is understandable, simply because judging people based on appearance alone is hard wired into our brains.
On the internet, nobody knows I'm actually a sweaty 30 year-old homeless man stealing Wi-Fi from an internet cafe in Taiwanistan.
Obviously, if you know me, you know I lied there, but what if I actually was that man? Would your opinion of me change? I bet it would.
The question is: should it? Do you really need to know the superficial things about a person to consider them a friend? Why do we define ourselves so heavily based on our appearance, but not our character?
It's what's on the inside that counts. What better way is there to reveal what's on the inside, than behind the cover of anonymity that is the internet? If someone is a jerk, I'll bet it will take less than 5 minutes to figure that out in an online text chat. Most people aren't brave enough to admit their true feelings in real life, so face to face conversation actually gives more false ideas, in that sense.