by FlipMode » July 16th, 2011, 11:25 pm
[quote="cioz"]So basically i came here because im the actual author. Totally no offense, i believe that there are, exactly as I mentioned in my theory, undercurrents that are not totally considered throughout the film.
Indeed, it was made by Disney, but Disney is not a simple childish film company. In other words, if Disney were a childish film company, it would not have such a widespread group of audiences, especially for TLK.
Everything requires analyzation, for the numerous articles or book written in "childish" tones do not always simply convey a simple meaning, and in the light of this statement, analyzation is needed.
We definitely could think that TLK covers a basic story about revenge, but this kind of cliche could not
[/quote]
There is a line between analysis and over analysing. Over analysing is the process where you look so hard into something that in reality is very simple and in doing so your mind picks up on things that were not intended to be there. What I am trying to say is, while what you are saying could make sense, it is just simply not true.
The fact is has a widespread appeal has nothing to do with it either, for example me being 19 I would say I am one of the more older fans of the film (granted there are way more older fans than me but nonetheless) and the reason I like it is because I can sympathise with the plot premise of loosing family members, retaking pride and what not. But that in no way means that there is some kind of hidden plot element. The fact is, if it were true then they would have just... You know, put it in the film.