






























DGFone wrote:Lol. Parkour is overrated. The reason is this: the entire thing was invented, as you say, to move more efficiently from point A to point B. Apparently, they forgot to include the third dimension here. Yes, jumping over a bench makes a straighter line than going around it, but you still have to go up and over it. And because in the vertical direction, you have to fight gravity, going around the bench ends up being much, much simpler.
Parkour is supposed to be more efficient than normal. It isn't. Therefore, for me, at least, it fails.
















DGFone wrote:Lol. Parkour is overrated. The reason is this: the entire thing was invented, as you say, to move more efficiently from point A to point B. Apparently, they forgot to include the third dimension here. Yes, jumping over a bench makes a straighter line than going around it, but you still have to go up and over it. And because in the vertical direction, you have to fight gravity, going around the bench ends up being much, much simpler.
Parkour is supposed to be more efficient than normal. It isn't. Therefore, for me, at least, it fails.















































FlipMode wrote:To me, at least, your example fails.
What about if you had a 50 metre wide brick wall at waist height, you cant say it would be easier to go around than just hop over it.



























































Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests