Do you believe in "Magical Creatures"?

[SlayerOfLight]

1 because I don't conclude there really is something there. the argument for me is not to PROVE the loch ness monster really excist, but only the CHANCE of it's excistance based on all eye witnesses and a few photograpics that are hard to tell it's a fake, and all the huge objects that have been caught on the sonar.

2 I would agree with scientists if they say banana's can't fly, because even a 1 years old could tell that.

3 a bowl of tomatoes would be would be no more bigger then like 6 inches, so I wouldn't really call it a ''big'' object from like 20 to 40 feet. I doubt a bowl of tomatoes would reach that size anyway.

4 the expiditions failed to FIND the thing in the lake, but they don't fail to prove the possibility of something big living in the water, and that's why blitz probally left. he doesn't even seem to wanna accept the possibility of something living in the loch. he also started getting more verbal abusive, and went off-topic by claiming that I lied.

and I guess we better stop arguing before the discussion goes wrong again just like last time. and I'm not in the mood for a internet brawl

[SlayerOfLight]

1 because I don't conclude there really is something there. the argument for me is not to PROVE the loch ness monster really excist, but only the CHANCE of it's excistance based on all eye witnesses and a few photograpics that are hard to tell it's a fake, and all the huge objects that have been caught on the sonar.

2 I would agree with scientists if they say banana's can't fly, because even a 1 years old could tell that.

3 a bowl of tomatoes would be would be no more bigger then like 6 inches, so I wouldn't really call it a ''big'' object from like 20 to 40 feet. I doubt a bowl of tomatoes would reach that size anyway.

4 the expiditions failed to FIND the thing in the lake, but they don't fail to prove the possibility of something big living in the water, and that's why blitz probally left. he doesn't even seem to wanna accept the possibility of something living in the loch. he also started getting more verbal abusive, and went off-topic by claiming that I lied.

and I guess we better stop arguing before the discussion goes wrong again just like last time. and I'm not in the mood for a internet brawl

Alright then.

Just to explain. With the bowl of tomatoes I was not being literal.
''I think there is a monster in Loch Ness'' and ''I think there is a giant bowl of tomatoes in Loch Ness'' has the same probability of being true. Monster have been proven over all the time that we have recorded history to not exist, and so have giant living bows of tomatoes, thus giving them the same probability of existence. It's sounds stupid but it really is not.

Then , I was replying on your comment ''just because scientists say it is fake doesn't make it fake''
If a scientist states the following two things:
''the loch ness monster is fake'' and ''bananas CAN fly''
You would disagree with both. However, we may have never seen flying bananas. Maybe they exist? We just haven't seen them.

take this sentence: ''the Loch-Ness-Monster lives in Loch ness''
Replace ''the Loch-Ness-Monster'' with any object you want and it will still have the same probability of existing. Thus making it's probability if existing as low as the probability of a giant swimming banana living in Loch Ness.

great, now we are starting to argue about fruit and giant banans instead of the loch ness monster. but know what, I'll just give up and let you win because this argument makes zero sense for both of us.

and just so you know, I already received a warning for supposedly ''involving'' relegion in this topic which I didn't. so I have no Idea if a few mods are liars, or just simply hate me. But I dont wanna give them another reason to give me a second stupid warning. so, I hope you dont mind if I quit.

[Miharuka]

Hmm.. I believe in the Loch Ness Monster.
It's probably not a dangerous monster or something I think and it most likely is already dead.
But it can be possible right?
Some people say they have seen it or something.
I mean the sea is so deep, is it even possible that we humans have seen ALL of it?? O:
I don't think so..

[SlayerOfLight]

Hmm.. I believe in the Loch Ness Monster.
It's probably not a dangerous monster or something I think and it most likely is already dead.
But it can be possible right?
Some people say they have seen it or something.
I mean the sea is so deep, is it even possible that we humans have seen ALL of it?? O:
I don't think so..

lol according to saint Columbia who had an encounter with the beast of loch ness somewhere in the 6th century, it was ANYTHING but harmless. saint Columbia even had to save Luigne moccu (one of his followers) when the terrible water-beast came after him when he was swimming in the river Ness. saint Columbia was also even told that the monster supposedly killed one of the locals. If interested, the full story can be read on wikipedia though.

and I dunno if this story is true or not, but it makes me kinda shiver on what kind of ''things'' could be lurking below the surface of the waters, which mankind has no knowledge about at all.

[NalaKiaraTani]

I don't just believe... I AM. MONSTERS ARE SO REAL! Nessie's pretty nice but she's really shy. And I guess I do believe in other magical beings if I believe in the Golden Witch. ALIENS ARE THE ENEMY. Here's a quote I found somewhere but I cannot quite remember where I think it proves my point
"Monsters are real, and ghosts are real too. They live inside us and sometimes, they win."
Have faith in what you will, but those of the magical world won't be sitting around crying cause you're a non believer. We have better things to do.

[KopsTheTerminator]

I don't just believe... I AM. MONSTERS ARE SO REAL! Nessie's pretty nice but she's really shy. And I guess I do believe in other magical beings if I believe in the Golden Witch. ALIENS ARE THE ENEMY. Here's a quote I found somewhere but I cannot quite remember where I think it proves my point
"Monsters are real, and ghosts are real too. They live inside us and sometimes, they win."
Have faith in what you will, but those of the magical world won't be sitting around crying cause you're a non believer. We have better things to do.

Are you drunk?

[BlitzRogue]

I think it was a mostly satirical post.

If I'm right in that, then I'm quite tempted to award a Pride Point for being awesome.

[NalaKiaraTani]

I don't just believe... I AM. MONSTERS ARE SO REAL! Nessie's pretty nice but she's really shy. And I guess I do believe in other magical beings if I believe in the Golden Witch. ALIENS ARE THE ENEMY. Here's a quote I found somewhere but I cannot quite remember where I think it proves my point
"Monsters are real, and ghosts are real too. They live inside us and sometimes, they win."
Have faith in what you will, but those of the magical world won't be sitting around crying cause you're a non believer. We have better things to do.

Are you drunk?

YES

Edit: You'll have to excuse me. I honestly have a hard time getting out of my imagination and have a problem of staying in my fursona's mindset. As for my belief I do believe in monsters and the golden witch and things like that.

[Azerane]

No I do not, and that's pretty much all there is to say on the matter really.

Yes, mythical creatures are awesome, but they're just that, mythical. Plenty of awesome real animals too.

[SlayerOfLight]

I dont believe much in magical creatures because I dont believe in magic. but however, I do believe there are ''animals'' that we haven't discovered yet, such as sea serpents and sea-monster like creatures. but not things like mermaids or something, or things that are half human and half animal or whatever XD