@BlitzRogue
''The 1987 search revealed a 3 "things" in the lake, which were all concluded to be anything from a seal to a group of salmon swimming together. And google has no knowledge of this expedition in 2000, so if you could provide some citation for that, it'd be appreciated.''
during operation deepscan (1987) even the sonar expert Darrell Lowrance admitted there was something living in the lake we don't understand. and they weren't concluded to be seals, but COULD'VE been seals. they weren't proven to be seals at all. David Steensland of Laurence said that one of the targets might be a very large known fish, but took it very unlikely at that kind of depth. the two other targets were strange and larger then sharks from the coast of Florida. even the project leader Adrian Shine said it was very UNLIKE salmon and known loch inhabitants. and they lost the 3 targets, so we can never be sure what they really were. and the expidition in 2000 I read this in the dutch wikipedia encyclopedia. twelf scientists with boats and sonar equipment were on the search for the beast, and caught a bit object on the sonar, but they quickly lost it.
''When you say one thing, and then say something else that negates the first statement, it's called a contradiction. In other words: lying. So, yes, that would in fact make you a liar. It's not exactly a difficult conclusion to come to... >.> ''
or maybe it's called a misunderstanding. what I really ment is that I definately believe in sea monsters and big unknown animals, and that I am not sure about the loch ness monster and accept it as a myth. how is this ''lying'' to you? seriously, why would I even need any reason to lie about something that small? It looks like you're just trying to be slightly verbal abusive.
''Also, accusing me of jumping to conclusions too quickly whilst simultaneously jumping to conclusions about me is not an effective way to make a point.''
lol no, because you already made that point yourself by accusing me ignorantly as a liar, for something you didn't catch. but no matter, even if you'd keep calling me a liar I'd be able to forgive you seventy times seven if I had to.
''Cute. However, I'm fairly certain this isn't a thread about religion, so I'd recommend you keep your potshots at atheism, and your preconceived notions about atheists, out of it. Thanks.''
once again you didn't read my statement very properly. I didn't attack atheism, I just said there are CERTAIN people here who aren't very kind to those who don't believe everything from science like they do. do you feel offended by that? wow... besides, I wasn't even talking to you right there.