[quote="Si Targaryen"][quote="Woeler"]
Today, in democracies leaders are chosen with an election in which everyone older than 18 can vote. Since the jobs in politics are extremely important this is a weird system. No other 'social group' in human society organizes this way. Would you hire an electrician to do you plumbing? No. But why should we 'hire' the uneducated to do our politics?
[/quote]
In that case, shouldn't only people with a degree in Politics get to vote? After all, why is someone with a degree in Arts. Literature or even Medicine going to have knowledge about politics?
I'd probably be classed as "uneducated", yet I own a book on UK Politics, which I've read. That's more than most of my "educated" friends have. Not all learning is done in the classroom.[/quote]
I get the feeling you're taking this too personal. Let me quote myself once again
[quote="Woeler"]I think I'm even going one step further. Voting age up to 21 and one can only vote if one has a college degree (or higher).(of course that only goes for societies in which the government actually pays for education, otherwise this idea would be completely ridiculous)[/quote]
You can read all the books you want. That is no proof of knowledge, to nobody. I want people who can vote on worldchanging decision to have a piece of paper that says ''Yes, I have proven myself to posses both the capacity and the mentality to make intelligent and educated decisions''. If you can do that, but didn't take the education (in the educationproviding state!), then well... you should have taken it.
We don't need politicians. Today's politicians are only there because most of the uneducated lot votes for them. We need biologists and ecologists on environment, we need economists on financial matters, we need criminologists on security, we need tacticians with a military education on defense and we need politicologists keep them all in place.
A good state is not a fair state. Electoral democracy is not efficient at all.