[quote="FromNZbrotha"]I definately believe in things like the loch ness monster. even though there isn't much physical evidence, there are too many eyewitnesses. true, many of them may be liars. but does that mean all of them are liars? also, most of these eye-witnesses usally discribe the creature with the same look and color. But the reason nessie isn't seen or heared about anymore, is most likely because he/she died, or the species died, or left the loch. after all, the loch ness is connected to the sea.[/quote]
The theories and sightings of the loch ness monster can be classified as ''false''. I already hear you ask ''why?''. I'll tell you, for decades divers have searched for the Loch Ness mosnter, not a single one found something. The only reports we have were of people who have absolutely nothing that can prove their sightings. There is also no such creature that does only appear to some. If it exists it should be a physical entity and noticable by anyone. Which would mean that the divers who searched for it should have found it, not to mention the size people claim it is. It is nearly impossible to miss it.
Also, the description given by people is almost 100% the description of a Elasmosaurus, which at it's oldest can be around 42 years. The Loch Ness legend started in 1933, which would mean it would be over 80 years (because it was probably there before 1933 if it ever was)
Also take in account that if it exists it would be classified as a coldblooded amphibian. Such large cold blooded amphibians could NEVER survive in the scottish climate.