by Tabby » August 24th, 2012, 4:01 am
[quote="WildSimba"][quote="SimbaCanHazDonut"]So it should be illegal for a woman to choose she doesn't want to carry with a baby, basically ruining her life and the child's itself, I mean, you can't private a person from deciding what to do with its body. It might have the POTENTIAL of life, but it is not a life in that moment, it might be biologically alive, but you know is nothing, NOTHING in the moment they do the abortion. I don't say abortion is such a good thing, cause there're better things the person could do, I'm talking about the right the person has to have an abort, the parents should be the ones to decide, specially the woman, what to do with that ''potential'', anyways, if you decide to not bring it to life, why is it a crime?, you're not killing.[/quote]
I hate when people say that. It's not her body she's deciding to do something with. The moment she became pregnant, she started sharing her body with another person. It's not a proper argument to say it's her body, it's her choice... because it's not just her body anymore, she's sharing it with another person.
And it is murder, you're taking away that Fetus's chance at developing further. Just because something doesn't have a brain, doesn't mean they're not there. If you cut down a tree before it has the proper chance to live, are you still taking away from the environment? Yes. Because that tree was meant to grow and be alive, that's why it was there. Same applies to a Fetus. Why should that mother have a right to murder her unborn child? She shouldn't.[/quote]
As I mentioned, it should be the parents choice, not yours or anybody else's, if she's sharing it with someone is with the father, ok... but what if the father doesn't want her to abort?, she's still the one who's going to carry with the baby on her womb for 9 months, why must she do that for him anyways, why should be the father's choice the one to be taken?.. But anyways, if both were agreeing with aborting the child, which would be more common, then why can't they?, it's their genetic material, it belongs to them, at least while it's only that, a mass of cells.
however, you're saying its murder to kill a mass of cells, THAT IS NOT A LIFE. dude that'd be like saying masturbation should be illegal cause you're taking away the sperm's chance to feveloping further.... Please!, if it is not a complete life, then is not murdering.
Now I ask you, about your example, are all those men who cuts trees in the jail?, cause they actually cut down a lot of trees every days to make paper or goods, houses, whatever... with the meat is the same, you're killing an animal for your comfort, one that could've had the chance to live... WHEN YOU EAT AN EGG, you're taking away its chance to live.. so that's kinda stupid to be considered.
If you could actually take away the fetus from the girl, and put it on somewhere else, fine, but sicne it's impossible, since you're not the one who's going to carry on with the burden, just let the choice to that pregnant woman.
Victory, at last!