by Todd23 » August 11th, 2015, 10:29 pm
Nah, I'm not really interested...
I heard once someone thought that the reason you didn't kill Scar at first was because, as much pain and destruction he caused, you thought he had too much "frail humanity" as he is lazy, irresponsible, cowardly, slobby, and a bit of a loser (remember he did have a tendency to just throw bones anywhere he wanted). Is there any truth to that or did you just not kill him at first because you didn't want to stoop down to his level?