by Carl » March 31st, 2015, 11:04 pm
[quote="ScarsLove"]and try being original once again. [/quote]
Are there any Disney movies that are original? All of the ones I know of were inspired by books/fairy tales/stories/history/etc. that already existed.
[quote="Elton John"]Because how else will Disney make it? I'm not saying I want it but...
The Disney live action remake train is currently accelerating, and I don't see them not going after one of their hottest properties. It might not be a completely logical choice but this is the same company that gave a lone ranger reboot over 200 million dollar budget, even disney can make completely illogical choices.[/quote]
Our point is, if the characters are all CGI, then what in the bloody hell is the point? Also that if Disney has ANY amount of intelligence about them, they WON'T make an "LA" TLK. They know that TLK is big but they also know that it's partly because of it's animation style. Otherwise, they would have changed the animation style for TLG and turned them into weird chibis or CGI characters. TLK would not be right in a different style, it would not be right with different voice actors, it would not be right at all to remake it. And as there are no human characters, it would be literally impossible for them to do a live action remake. Sure the characters in the Jungle Book will be CGI, but there is still a human to be played by a real actor, and so because of that one human it can be called live action. Without human characters, it can't be LA, and so it would be stupid to add TLK to the "live action remake train." It's not like Beauty and the Beast or any of the fairy tales that have been told many times where different versions can still be told. The Lion King is a different version of Hamlet. They can't tell a different version of TLK. They can do another version of Hamlet, but not of TLK. It just won't work. They can try it, but all they'll do is piss off people.