User talk:Superbabysimba - Revision history

Superbabysimba at 20:45, 13 April 2011

2011-04-13T20:45:49Z

Wildsimba at 20:14, 13 April 2011

2011-04-13T20:14:09Z

Superbabysimba at 18:45, 13 April 2011

2011-04-13T18:45:24Z

Moka: Created page with "I enjoyed the Fluffy article very much, great job! ~~~~"

2011-01-03T21:17:37Z

Created page with "I enjoyed the Fluffy article very much, great job! ~~~~"

New page

I enjoyed the Fluffy article very much, great job! ~ [[User:Moka|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted #575757;font-family:'Palatino Linotype', Georgia, sans-serif; color:#0a1529;">Moka</span>]] 13:17, 3 January 2011 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:45, 13 April 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Thank you. Though apparently some people didn't think it so great as it's almost completely different now from what it was originally... --[[User:Superbabysimba\|Superbabysimba]] 13 April 2011 (PDT)		:Thank you. Though apparently some people didn't think it so great as it's almost completely different now from what it was originally... --[[User:Superbabysimba\|Superbabysimba]] 13 April 2011 (PDT)
	::Well, obviously it's not quite as perfect as you may have thought earlier. I believe there are articles that need more attention then this, but at least it should be fully factual and easy to read. Before I edited it around, it was mostly your own theorys, and that's not really right. I liked what you wrote quite a bit, and thought you had some good points, but as far as confusing people with what's official, and what's not, that doesn't need to be done. --[[User:Wildsimba\|Wildsimba]] 13:14, 13 April 2011 (PDT)		::Well, obviously it's not quite as perfect as you may have thought earlier. I believe there are articles that need more attention then this, but at least it should be fully factual and easy to read. Before I edited it around, it was mostly your own theorys, and that's not really right. I liked what you wrote quite a bit, and thought you had some good points, but as far as confusing people with what's official, and what's not, that doesn't need to be done. --[[User:Wildsimba\|Wildsimba]] 13:14, 13 April 2011 (PDT)
		+	:::When read with care and thought, people ought to be able to pick up what's official and what's theory in the way the article originally was. But of course I do understand that the clearer and easier to read the better. --[[User:Superbabysimba\|Superbabysimba]] 13 April 2011 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:14, 13 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I enjoyed the Fluffy article very much, great job! ~ [[User:Moka\|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted #575757;font-family:'Palatino Linotype', Georgia, sans-serif; color:#0a1529;">Moka</span>]] 13:17, 3 January 2011 (PST)		I enjoyed the Fluffy article very much, great job! ~ [[User:Moka\|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted #575757;font-family:'Palatino Linotype', Georgia, sans-serif; color:#0a1529;">Moka</span>]] 13:17, 3 January 2011 (PST)
	:Thank you. Though apparently some people didn't think it so great as it's almost completely different now from what it was originally... --[[User:Superbabysimba\|Superbabysimba]] 13 April 2011 (PDT)		:Thank you. Though apparently some people didn't think it so great as it's almost completely different now from what it was originally... --[[User:Superbabysimba\|Superbabysimba]] 13 April 2011 (PDT)
		+	::Well, obviously it's not quite as perfect as you may have thought earlier. I believe there are articles that need more attention then this, but at least it should be fully factual and easy to read. Before I edited it around, it was mostly your own theorys, and that's not really right. I liked what you wrote quite a bit, and thought you had some good points, but as far as confusing people with what's official, and what's not, that doesn't need to be done. --[[User:Wildsimba\|Wildsimba]] 13:14, 13 April 2011 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 13 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I enjoyed the Fluffy article very much, great job! ~ [[User:Moka\|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted #575757;font-family:'Palatino Linotype', Georgia, sans-serif; color:#0a1529;">Moka</span>]] 13:17, 3 January 2011 (PST)		I enjoyed the Fluffy article very much, great job! ~ [[User:Moka\|<span style="border-bottom:1px dotted #575757;font-family:'Palatino Linotype', Georgia, sans-serif; color:#0a1529;">Moka</span>]] 13:17, 3 January 2011 (PST)
		+	:Thank you. Though apparently some people didn't think it so great as it's almost completely different now from what it was originally... --[[User:Superbabysimba\|Superbabysimba]] 13 April 2011 (PDT)