Signatures

[SnowyCheetah]

There you have it Moka, from a netbook user herself.

In fact, I used to browse MLK all the time from my IPOD TOUCH. Tiny screen on there, and yet I didn't die of scrolling. I think that pretty much debunks the scrolling issue, eh?

[WildSimba]

^ The signature could easily be just as important as the message itself. No one would like this forum at all if signatures weren't allowed, and it was all just text.

[Moka]

I never suggested that netbooks would have problems accessing the forums. You did. I said people with small resolutions such as 800x600 without the ability to scroll easily from side to side or zoom out.

Edit; and I disagree, WS. I've been on forums that don't allow signatures before and the discussions are actually quite interesting.

[Simbadacub]

If the Sig heights and etc are annoying you or whatever so much, Disable sigs, or take up less space and put them in a spoiler. THEN the members can just read the comments THEN look at the sigs. but Yet, I agree with everyone esle, its far to small

[Moka]

SDC, that's not fair, and I've already explained why.

[SnowyCheetah]

Uhmmmmmmm iPod touch has a helluva lot smaller resolution than that, Moka. also, zooming out is actually possible in any web browser that's in use nowdays.

Sooooo problem solved, without restricting so much. I didn't say don't restrict at all, but this is way too much.

Take it from the members, Moka, without us your forum would be nothing. You would do well to keep that in mind.

[Simbaholikov]

I'm agreeing with everyone else, it is too small atm..

[SuperBabySimba]

[quote="WildSimba"]^ The signature could easily be just as important as the message itself. No one would like this forum at all if signatures weren't allowed, and it was all just text.[/quote]

'No one' is seriously over-killing. There are tons of people in this world and fandom who actually think the discussing and company more important than huge signatures. And seriously people, they are not prohibiting signatures or images in them, so again, cut the drama. Please.

[supersimba]

lol cmon guys, Moka obviously wants the whole site nice and neat for when he uses it as part of his portfolio. Oh, you didnt know his "best case scenario" is to work as a web developer?

[quote="Moka's FurJournal"]My goals in life are to become a full-time computer programmer (best case scenario would be web developer) [/quote]

Moka doesn't care about you guys, MLK is just his hope of building a rep as a web developer. Ever notice how decisions get made round here that really aren't in the interests of everyone on the forum? (aside from sheep and backseat Mods. That's you, SuperBabySimba).

You all got used big time.

10/10 to Moka, the best troll on MLK

(btw took screenshots of this post before and after posting, if it gets deleted screenshots get forward to everyone until the censorship is stopped)

[FlipMode]

So am I the ONLY one who thinks this new size limit is fine?LoL

I mean I have received a lot of nice comments on my graphics (by my standards) and all of them fit the new limit, I do not see the issue? and since text wraps, links and stuff are not going to be an issue....

I guess really, what I am trying to say is...