by YFWE » February 9th, 2011, 8:25 pm
In just about any other ranking I've seen, be it when I played sports in high school, academic orderings, whatever, the PLACING would be as such for this:
1. FlipMode
2. Simbaholic
2. Amanda
4. SnowyCheetah
4. Sillydogthegreat
6. Lilac
By the other logic, Cdot, who received the lowest amount of votes, finished 9th. Out of 14. Boy, that sure makes sense.
This is a big to-do about nothing. The focus should be on the three who were, in the forum's collective eyes, good enough. Not the two who weren't.
EDIT: I SHOULD NOTE, however, that if the final field was expanded to include Snowy and Sillydog, I would have no problem with this, as I have no problem with them at all. All I'm saying is that in most -- if not all -- other circles, top 3 would mean top 3, not 5, unless you had first place winning a specific amount, second winning a lesser amount, and third tied at a certain amount, at which point you'd add. That's all I'm saying here. Nothing against the candidates.