[quote="DGFone"][quote="Regulus"]
[quote="Tora"]Well considering that the Hyenas were allowed to come into the Pride Lands and everything basically died you can see they had no respect for the law or order.[/quote]
This is a logical fallacy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc[/quote]
You do know that it's official cannon that by allowing the hyenas in, Scar directly lead to the troubles in the Pride Lands, right? To sum it up: Scar invites his pals in. These pals invite their pals. Now the predator population has increased in a way that can be represented by the [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaviside_step_function]heavyside function[/url]: a very sudden, near instantaneous jump.
Unlike your local carrot shop, prey animals want to live, and can do something about it. So just as the demand for prey animal jumped, the population of available prey began a very steep decline: over-hunting of the herds as well as the rest of the herds leaving the Pride Lands in fear of their lives.
And if you know anything about ecosystem biology, then you should know that something as drastic as the entire herbivore population fleeing will cause severe damage to the local plant life, as the gasses will grow uncontrollably and effectively starve themselves to death as they deplete available nutrients faster than they can be replenished. Add a drought, and you have an ecological disaster. Heck, even without the drought there was going to be an ecological disaster.
So was Mufasa bad in banishing all hyenas? Perhaps. But Scar was much worse in letting them in without any checks in place to control their population, not to mention his severe favoritism towards said hyenas, only making the problem worse.
It's not a logical fallacy to say that letting the hyenas caused the devastation, because when you actually connect the dots, you will see that sometimes, like in this case, Action A directly leads to Action B.
So before you pull off an insulting move as to call an argument a "logical fallacy", [i]explain[/i] how it won't work. Because to say "no, you're wrong!" without any backing evidence... is rather stupid and mean.
Now as for is Simba better than Mufasa? I will say that while Simba made plenty of mistakes, he had to learn from the very rock bottom how to be a king without an actual king to help him. Combined with the obstacles he had to overcome - returning the Pride Lands to their pre-drought state, for example - I will give him my vote. He at least demonstrated that he can learn from his mistakes, a trait that we didn't see Mufasa do.[/quote] Seconds from Disaster. Since Scar's rule turned into a disaster zone, what were the chain of events that lead to this disaster, before and during the first movie, could this disaster be avoided, if yes, why didn't it happen? Why did the weather change after Scar toke over the Pridelands? Why did so many animals and palnts die? Why did it had to take about almost three years for Simba to return and remove Scar from power? Now with advance computer simulation will take us where no camera can, into the heart of the disaster zone. Disasters don't just, triggered by a chain of critical events, unreval the clues, and countdown those seconds from disaster.