Page 32 of 48

Re: Signatures

PostPosted: December 21st, 2010, 11:58 pm
by SnowyCheetah
You got an incorrect quote by supersimba there, SBS.

I'd also like to point out that judging by the reaction this is getting, it's probably not going to please everyone :P

Moka, are you denying what supersimba said?

Re: Signatures

PostPosted: December 21st, 2010, 11:58 pm
by TheIvanMuse
How about you all take a huge chill pill and lay off of this!
There are tons of forums where signature sizes are much smaller and you don't see anyone complaining about it. Bottom line is,why would you need ALL that space just for a signature.
Are you promoting your graphics? If yes,make a graphics thread.
Are you promoting your site? If yes,there's a topic for that too.
Are you just wanting to have a nice graphic to show off? Well,that can surely fit into the prohibited size.

But if you are REALLY that desperate about getting a bigger,sig,I say we amp the site up to 300X600.

And I agree with what Moka said,both about supersimba and SuperBabySimba.

Re: Signatures

PostPosted: December 21st, 2010, 11:59 pm
by Simbaholikov
[quote="SuperBabySimba"][quote="FlipMode"]So am I the ONLY one who thinks this new size limit is fine?LoL[/quote]

No. I think it's fine too. And I think I saw a third person. And of course Moka and the other mods do too.
[/quote]

Nope, AustralianChaos told me on MSN he thought the new limits were too small, too.

Re: Signatures

PostPosted: December 22nd, 2010, 12:00 am
by SnowyCheetah
Way to listen to your members and your mods, Moka. >.>

Re: Signatures

PostPosted: December 22nd, 2010, 12:01 am
by Moka
Yes, of course I am.

I've done a bit of research and the maximum width I can allow for accessibility is 590px. The maximum height I can allow is debatable, but I'd be willing to go to 350px like Snowy suggested.

Re: Signatures

PostPosted: December 22nd, 2010, 12:01 am
by Ushujaa
okay guys i may not agree with the size limit but what supersimba said was seriously unnecessary this conversation is getting out of hand and people need to not be so closed minded,

yeah the signiture size reduction sucks for some but it's helpful to others...

i don't agree with the size change but i can't believe how people are being so childish towards this change...

Moka i understand where you're coming from but i still don't agree that signature sizes should be reduced...

that is how a conversation should go...

not saying meaningless hurtful things to one of the better admins i've met because you disagree with what he's saying!

Re: Signatures

PostPosted: December 22nd, 2010, 12:02 am
by SnowyCheetah
Then let's go to 590x350.

Actually I agree with supersimba, unpopular as that may be, it's true.

Re: Signatures

PostPosted: December 22nd, 2010, 12:03 am
by Miharuka
Is my signature fine this way then?? xD

Re: Signatures

PostPosted: December 22nd, 2010, 12:04 am
by Moka
You guys don't need to bring in all the hate when trying to present your argument.

Re: Signatures

PostPosted: December 22nd, 2010, 12:05 am
by SnowyCheetah
Are we going to go to 350x590?