Page 1 of 3
Take a stand on Disney Animal Royalty

Posted:
September 27th, 2015, 6:37 pm
by gothprincesskiara
According to this link, it finally says why Nala cant be a Disney Princess, and im getting to the point where I am getting pissed off by it, I am a Disney princes fan too but seriously, humans alot of humans are about greed, its always the human, I beleive that alot of humans don't appreciate the animal enough's it the one thing im all about and is why im going into animal conservation, but now Disney wont even let our favorite Royal animals get some spot light, im getting sick of it and I think its time to take a stand on this, or at least, I wish there was a way
http://www.tvguide.com/galleries/38-fac ... 47b643e2d/
Re: Take a stand on Disney Animal Royalty

Posted:
September 27th, 2015, 7:28 pm
by Elton John
Disneys Maid Marian is also of royal blood. Don't know if she's enough to be a princess though.
As far as Nala goes, is being betrothed to a prince enough to be a princess? I think of her as more of a Queen though.
Kiara definitely should be a disney princess, species be damned.
Re: Take a stand on Disney Animal Royalty

Posted:
September 27th, 2015, 7:51 pm
by SlayerOfLight
Seriously, is something like this really worth giving a f#k to? I don't even see how this is a ''world issue'' at all... Isn't it funny how the world is currently a mess, and then there are people actually whining about Nala not being a Disney princess.
But okay then. To get back to the topic, Nala was never even a ''princess'' to begin with. She was just an ordinary cub with no royal blood that just ended up being elected for queen because the kitty she fell in love with happend to be a king. In order to be a princess, one has to be the daughter of a royal couple, and as far as I can tell Sarafina never was a queen at all. So all in all I don't even understand why you're worrying about this.
Re: Take a stand on Disney Animal Royalty

Posted:
September 27th, 2015, 8:01 pm
by Elton John
Disney princesses are very serious business, bro.
Also a princess can be a commoner married to a prince, like lady diana.
Re: Take a stand on Disney Animal Royalty

Posted:
September 27th, 2015, 8:09 pm
by SlayerOfLight
But Nala is neither of them, and that's the point I'm trying to make.
Re: Take a stand on Disney Animal Royalty

Posted:
September 27th, 2015, 8:16 pm
by Elton John
Mulan is neither a princess and she married shang li, who wasn't a prince yet she is a disney princess.
The only reason why I want nala to be a disney princess is for there to be more merch of her.
Re: Take a stand on Disney Animal Royalty

Posted:
September 27th, 2015, 8:19 pm
by FlipMode
I thought she wasn't a Disney Princess because she is a queen. Can't say I've given it a lot of thought, though.
I mean I don't really think it's a World Issue.
Re: Take a stand on Disney Animal Royalty

Posted:
September 27th, 2015, 8:22 pm
by SlayerOfLight
[quote="Elton John"]Mulan is neither a princess and she married shang li, who wasn't a prince yet she is a disney princess.
The only reason why I want nala to be a disney princess is for there to be more merch of her.[/quote]
Then by all means, go ahead and sue Disney Company.
Re: Take a stand on Disney Animal Royalty

Posted:
September 27th, 2015, 8:23 pm
by Elton John
Wars have been fought over which disney princess is the best.
Well, OKAY maybe by wars I mean 'internet arguements'.
And by 'internet arguements' I mean I imagine them happening.
And by imagining them happening I mean whenever I play gears of war online I pretend that the locusts are enemies of anna and elsa and I must protect the honor of the city of arrendale.
so it's technically a war
Re: Take a stand on Disney Animal Royalty

Posted:
September 27th, 2015, 8:48 pm
by SlayerOfLight
If there are really people who engage in such meaningless arguments then my advice to them would be to find a hobby or go out a little more often.
And I fail to understand why you can't rather pretend that all the locusts are ''elsas'' and ''annas'' instead...