Page 1 of 3

Republican candidate advocates death penalty for children

PostPosted: October 9th, 2012, 3:53 pm
by Woeler
[quote="HuffingtonPost"]Charlie Fuqua, the Republican candidate for the Arkansas House of Representatives who called for expelling Muslims from the United States in his book, also wrote in support for instituting the death penalty for "rebellious children."

In "God's Law," Fuqua's 2012 book, the candidate wrote that while parents love their children, a process could be set up to allow for the institution of the death penalty for "rebellious children," according to the Arkansas Times. Fuqua, who is anti-abortion, points out that the course of action involved in sentencing a child to death is described in the Bible and would involve judicial approval. While it is unlikely that many parents would seek to have their children killed by the government, Fuqua wrote, such power would serve as a way to stop rebellious children.[/quote]

Full article

Image

I am truly speechless...
It's not like these people are elected to be state officials/representatives... oh wait... they are...

Re: Republican candidate advocates death penalty for childre

PostPosted: October 9th, 2012, 4:06 pm
by Libre
This is totally ridiculous. If he would be on the internet he would be considered a big troll.
But anyway, as said in the article, I do not think any parents would let their children be killed as described in the bible.. This is just.. Acutally the ridiculousness makes me laugh :D

Re: Republican candidate advocates death penalty for childre

PostPosted: October 9th, 2012, 4:11 pm
by AdAstrα
I.....what? This has got to be the most bizarre thing I've ever heard. Completely ridiculous.

Re: Republican candidate advocates death penalty for childre

PostPosted: October 9th, 2012, 4:16 pm
by UncoordinatedPisces
Da fuq is this crap. As a rebellious child, I object to this! x) Lol. But seriously, some people. Stupid republican *eye roll* (no offence to decent republicans out there)

I doubt my mother would let me be killed by the government...damn...thinking about my mum getting all angry is scary lol. You guys have no idea...

Re: Republican candidate advocates death penalty for childre

PostPosted: October 9th, 2012, 4:18 pm
by TheRoguePrince
He's just a fringe candidate, who is never going to win. The mainstream Republican party would find the ideas presented in his book ridiculous. It's silly to even pay him any attention. Plus, he's not even in congress. He is just a candidate. Anyone can write a book and run for office. So I'm not seeing your point. He's crazy? Of course. We should ban people from trying to hold public office if we don't agree with them? I think it's against the constitution lol.

I remember reading that you were against restricting reproductive rights, so I assume you aren't against political and speech rights as well? ;)

Edit: *goes to look for fringe candidates in the Netherlands*

Re: Republican candidate advocates death penalty for childre

PostPosted: October 9th, 2012, 4:22 pm
by wolfishgirl
one question... Woeler why are you looking up things about American government... I mean i would understand it if it was an American but your from the Netherlands....

and honestly, people say stupid things all the time. That was a stupid ase thing she said and will never get elected. I mean i can run for office and spout stupid idealistic crap, but i doubt that i would ever get elected.

Re: Republican candidate advocates death penalty for childre

PostPosted: October 9th, 2012, 4:35 pm
by Woeler
[quote="TheRoguePrince"]He's just a fringe candidate, who is never going to win. The mainstream Republican party would find the ideas presented in his book ridiculous. It's silly to even pay him any attention. Plus, he's not even in congress. He is just a candidate. Anyone can write a book and run for office. So I'm not seeing your point. He's crazy? Of course. We should ban people from trying to hold public office if we don't agree with them? I think it's against the constitution lol.

I remember reading that you were against restricting reproductive rights, so I assume you aren't against political and speech rights as well? ;)

Edit: *goes to look for fringe candidates in the Netherlands*[/quote]

I'm actually just against idiots. People who say things like that should not even be allowed to get to that position. This kind of this so called ''freedom of speech'', Includes the freedom to discriminate and spread hate. Freedom of speech has it's limits. Then again, we are talking about a country in which being obese is genetic and being gay is a choice.(omg people it is a joke, sarcasm)The fact that people like this are even running to get to those positions gives off a message to the rest of the world. This is a fine example for why the rest of the world stereotypes Americans as stupid. Look at what people in their politics say ''child execution'' ''rape can't get you pregnant'' ''being gay is a disease or a choice''.

Our society is too secular. People who scream stupid things like that will be forced to step down by the people. Just as our Christian party, the leader screamed ridiculous things about abortion. People were mad as hell and now he's gone.

anyway, wanna debate, add me on msn, some people get mad when I talk about american politics.
[quote="wolfishgirl"]one question... Woeler why are you looking up things about American government... I mean i would understand it if it was an American but your from the Netherlands....
[/quote]
It's not like the world economy is largely influenced by the US or anything...

Re: Republican candidate advocates death penalty for childre

PostPosted: October 9th, 2012, 4:44 pm
by TheRoguePrince
[quote="Woeler1"]People who say things like that should not even be allowed to get to that position. This kind of this so called ''freedom of speech'', Includes the freedom to discriminate and spread hate. Freedom of speech has it's limits.[/quote]
Not really. Free speech wasn't meant to protect speech that society accepts. Free speech was designed to allow people to talk about whatever they wished without a big hammer loaming over them.

[quote="Woeler1"]Then again, we are talking about a country in which being obese is genetic and being gay is a choice.[/quote]
I bet you think Wisconsin and Switzerland are made of cheese, Brits all have bad teeth, Mexicans get drunk on Tequlia after gardening in Mexico, Germans are just goth nazis in disguise, and the Chinese abort all girls. ;) Stereotypes are not fun.

Re: Republican candidate advocates death penalty for childre

PostPosted: October 9th, 2012, 4:51 pm
by Woeler
[quote="TheRoguePrince"][quote="Woeler1"]People who say things like that should not even be allowed to get to that position. This kind of this so called ''freedom of speech'', Includes the freedom to discriminate and spread hate. Freedom of speech has it's limits.[/quote]
Not really. Free speech wasn't meant to protect speech that society accepts. Free speech was designed to allow people to talk about whatever they wished without a big hammer loaming over them.

[quote="Woeler1"]Then again, we are talking about a country in which being obese is genetic and being gay is a choice.[/quote]
I bet you think Wisconsin and Switzerland are made of cheese, Brits all have bad teeth, Mexicans get drunk on Tequlia after gardening in Mexico, Germans are just goth nazis in disguise, and the Chinese abort all girls. ;) Stereotypes are not fun.[/quote]

I was actually stereotyping until: 47% of Americans think being gay is a choice

And while that may be the literal meaning of free speech. The constitution of my country forbids hatespeech, discrimination and racism in the first constitution while free speech is the seventh constitution. Free speech stops where others get hurt. A society is meant to live in harmony. Love thy neighbor. Not fear thy neighbor.

Re: Republican candidate advocates death penalty for childre

PostPosted: October 9th, 2012, 4:54 pm
by wolfishgirl
All countries have minorities. Yes, the minorities may be bad, but you can't sterotype the whole country from the minority. We also have freedom of speech, but we CAN NOT spread slander, or say things that cause distress. The freedom of speech we have is limited.